Coronavirus : UK Poor Twice as Likely to Die from Covid-19 and other observations

In early May 2020, RT News reports Poorest in England MORE THAN TWICE as likely to die from Covid-19 as richest ‘Trying every trick in the book’: UK government changes rules to hit 100k coronavirus tests target US should have spent half its military budget on healthcare system instead of missiles Poor most vulnerable New … Continue reading “Coronavirus : UK Poor Twice as Likely to Die from Covid-19 and other observations”

In early May 2020, RT News reports

Poor most vulnerable

New UK figures show that the deadly coronavirus does indeed discriminate in unequal societies, and badly, revealing that Covid-19 deaths in the most deprived areas of England are over double the amount in the least deprived areas.

Data published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Friday reveal the shocking consequences of being poor in England. For deaths involving Covid-19 between March 1 and April 17, the mortality rate in the most deprived areas was 55.1 deaths per 100,000 population, compared to 25.3 deaths in the least deprived areas.

Editor’s Note: It would be interesting to see the prison statistics included in this report to see he disparity in risk between Judge Baraitser and the prosecution versus Julian Assange

Editor’s Note: Reading at the twitter thread above it is possible the death rate may be affected by relative risk of catching covid-19 ( say information or density ) and the death rate upon being infected may be more informative

Coronavirus Testing Rule Change

In its scramble to hit the target of 100,000 Covid-19 tests a day by the end of April, the UK government has revised the way it counts them, the Health Service Journal (HSJ) reports. UK health officials deny the claim.

A test would previously only have been counted in its tally once the sample had been processed in a laboratory, but that’s changed in the past few days, a senior source told the HSJ.

It’s alleged that the Department of Health and Social Care is now also including in its official numbers those tests that have simply been mailed out, regardless of whether the sample has been returned by the recipient. 

We’re now counting a home test as tests which have been sent to people’s homes.

HSJ reports that up to 50,000 of the tests that will be registered as having taken place by the landmark date of April 30 will actually only have been mailed. That figure will also include those home tests that recipients have merely agreed to receive in the randomized trial being undertaken across England.

In the past week, 23–30 April, the number of ‘actual tests’ reported by the government has increased dramatically, from 23,560 to 81,611.

Health Care versus Missiles Cost Benefit

The Covid-19 pandemic should be a rallying call to change an economic system that spends billions each year on the tools of war but can’t produce a decent healthcare system, bestselling author John Perkins told RT.

Perkins is best known for his book ‘Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,’ in which he describes how American corporate elites plunder other nations to enrich themselves.

The economic system that puts immediate gains above all else, which Perkins calls an “economy of death” may be as lethal to common Americans as to people in Latin America or Eastern Asia, he said in an interview with RT Spanish. One only needs to look at the death toll of the Covid-19 epidemic in the US to see the proof.

“Our annual military budget is something between $600 billion and $700 billion. But we’ve just spent about $3 trillion to fight coronavirus. If we had spent half of that military budget over the last 10 years creating a better healthcare system in this country, we would all be better off now. The world would be better off,” he said.

The big flaw of the current arrangement is that corporations don’t suffer financially for inflicting long-term damage.

“In a way, it boils down to the driving force behind the ‘death economy,’ which is to maximize the short-term profits regardless of social or environmental costs,” Perkins said.

CoE on COVID-19 pandemic: urgent steps are needed to protect the rights of prisoners in Europe

On the 6th April 2020, the CoE Commissioner for Human Rights issued the statement I call on Council of Europe member states to safeguard the rights and health of all persons in prison during the COVID-19 pandemic. Convicted prisoners and persons on remand are among those most vulnerable to viral contagion as they are held … Continue reading “CoE on COVID-19 pandemic: urgent steps are needed to protect the rights of prisoners in Europe”

On the 6th April 2020, the CoE Commissioner for Human Rights issued the statement

I call on Council of Europe member states to safeguard the rights and health of all persons in prison during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Convicted prisoners and persons on remand are among those most vulnerable to viral contagion as they are held in a high-risk environment: in general, detention facilities are not adapted to face large-scale epidemics, and the basic protective measures such as social distancing and hygiene rules cannot be observed as easily as outside, exposing prisoners to greater health risks. Furthermore, in many European countries the pandemic strikes in a context of overcrowded prisons and poor detention conditions in cramped, collective cells, with unsatisfactory health services, as well as higher rates of infectious and chronic diseases among detainees, such as tuberculosis, diabetes and HIV. Across Europe, a number of contaminations and some COVID 19-related deaths in prison have already been reported; tension in prisons has increased since the beginning of the pandemic crisis, leading to acts of protest (sometimes violent) in reaction to restrictions on visits or other activities.

To prevent large-scale coronavirus outbreaks in places of detention, several member states initiated the release of certain categories of prisoners. Many others are adapting their criminal justice policies in order to reduce their prison population through various means, including temporary or early releases and amnesties; home detention and commutation of sentences; and suspending investigations and the execution of sentences. I strongly urge all member states to make use of all available alternatives to detention whenever possible and without discrimination.

According to the relevant human rights standards as indicated by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) in its COVID-19 Statement of Principles, the resort to alternatives to deprivation of liberty is imperative in situations of overcrowding and even more so in cases of emergency. Particular consideration should be given to those detainees with underlying health conditions; older persons who do not pose a threat to society; and those who have been charged or convicted for minor or non-violent offences. The decrease of the prison population is indispensable across Europe to ensure the effective implementation of the sanitary regulations and to ease the mounting pressure on prison personnel and the penitentiary system as a whole. Meanwhile, those released from detention who need support should be given appropriate access to emergency accommodation and basic services, including health care. Clearly, in this context, it is also all the more imperative that those persons, including human rights defenders, activists and journalists, who are – in some member states – detained in violation of human rights standards be immediately and unconditionally released.

Governments should also ensure that during the COVID-19 pandemic the human rights of all those who remain in detention are upheld while taking the specific needs of the most vulnerable detainees, persons with disabilities, pregnant women and juvenile detainees into account. Any restrictions imposed on detainees should be non-discriminatory, necessary, proportionate, time-limited and transparent. For instance, where restrictions to family visits and other outside contacts appear necessary, they should imperatively be mitigated by alternative arrangements such as extended access to phone or video communications. The absolute nature of the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment should never be compromised by measures taken in prisons including in the case of isolation for health reasons. All measures should be taken to protect the right to life and to health of prisoners and prison staff in line with WHO Europe’s recommendations. As stressed by the IASC Interim Guidance, prisoners should continue to have access to information, legal assistance and independent complaint mechanisms. Prison monitoring mechanisms should be able to continue to oversee the situation while taking precautions to avoid exposing people to further risks (“do no harm” principle).

To effectively meet the challenge of fighting the coronavirus outbreak in places of detention, member states should urgently adopt and implement a humane and comprehensive crisis plan supported by adequate human and financial resources, and which caters to the needs of those who leave prisons, those who remain in detention and prison staff. This should be done in consultation and co-operation with relevant human rights stakeholders, in particular National Preventive Mechanisms, other independent monitoring bodies, national human rights structures and human rights NGOs.

Read official announcement on CoE web site

Baltasar Garzon is discharged due to pneumonia derived from the coronavirus

On 3rd April 2020 Vozpopuli reports The jurist and former judge of the National Court, Baltasar Garzon, was released on Thursday at the Ruber Clinic in Madrid, where he was treated for bilateral pneumonia derived from the coronavirus for which he was admitted on March 24. In a statement sent to Europa Press, Garzon adds … Continue reading “Baltasar Garzon is discharged due to pneumonia derived from the coronavirus”

On 3rd April 2020 Vozpopuli reports

The jurist and former judge of the National Court, Baltasar Garzon, was released on Thursday at the Ruber Clinic in Madrid, where he was treated for bilateral pneumonia derived from the coronavirus for which he was admitted on March 24.

In a statement sent to Europa Press, Garzon adds that since this Friday, and by medical prescription, treatment will continue in absolute isolation, in my home, for 14 days, “like so many thousands more people, until full recovery.”

The jurist, who currently works as a lawyer, thanks in the note “sincerely and deeply all the expressions of solidarity and affection” that it has received in recent days, “as well as the support of those who, persistently, every day at 8:00 p.m., confirm their solidarity from windows and balconies, towards the health services and all those who are watching over this health crisis , social and economic happen as soon as possible “.

All of these people, according to Garzon, are being a main component of the recovery of those who suffer diseases caused by the virus, especially to combat the loneliness that this generates.

“I want Special thanks to all medical staff., health, auxiliary and those who take care of feeding, cleaning and caring for the sick and sick, the enormous work they are doing, “says Garzon, adding that he has not been able to see their faces or say goodbye with a hug.

“I have only been able to see his eyes, behind the glasses and isolation masks, but in all of them I have verified clean looks of vocation, self-denial, sacrifice, harmony and dedication to others. I will always be indebted to all of you, “ends the note.

Waiter was the head of the Central Court of Instruction number 5 of the National Court, where he practiced for almost 22 years, from 1988 until May 14, 2010. In 2012 he was disqualified by the Supreme Court for eleven years for a crime of prevarication in competition with another against constitutional guarantees for intervening the communications of the leaders of the plot ‘Gurtel’ with their lawyers in prison.

In his years in the National Court focused its work on the fight against the terrorist group ETA, his persecution of Galician drug trafficking was notorious, he investigated the state terrorism of the GAL and he gained international fame by ordering the arrest of the Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet.

Throughout his professional career he also fleetingly passed through politics -independent by the PSOE- and after his disqualification he has been an advisor to the International Criminal Court in The Hague and has led the defense of the founder of Wikileaks Julian Assange.

Read reporting article in Web24 News

‘The political nature of Julian Assange’s extradition process to the US can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt, as it involves large-scale espionage operations, violations of attorney-client privilege & cross-Atlantic legal pressures’

Baltasar Garzon head of Assange legal team

UK: Adjournment of Julian Assange’s US extradition hearing considered amidst coronavirus concerns

On 27th April, Reporters without Borders (RFS) reported Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s legal team has requested adjournment of his US extradition hearing to allow for adequate preparation of his defence, amidst concerns for his health as COVID-19 reportedly spreads at Belmarsh prison. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reiterates the need for Assange’s immediate release before his … Continue reading “UK: Adjournment of Julian Assange’s US extradition hearing considered amidst coronavirus concerns”

On 27th April, Reporters without Borders (RFS) reported

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s legal team has requested adjournment of his US extradition hearing to allow for adequate preparation of his defence, amidst concerns for his health as COVID-19 reportedly spreads at Belmarsh prison. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reiterates the need for Assange’s immediate release before his health is further jeopardised, and calls for the extradition hearing to be postponed until lockdown conditions are lifted.

On 27 April, a hearing took place at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to consider the application of Julian Assange’s legal team to adjourn his US extradition hearing. The full hearing had been scheduled to resume on 18 May, when three weeks of evidence were expected to be heard, following the presentation of legal arguments in February. 

District judge Vanessa Baraitser presided, and was joined in the courtroom by legal counsel. Assange was expected to attend via videolink, but he did not take part, and his lawyer Edward Fitzgerland QC reported that he had received medical advice that it would not be safe for him to be taken to the video room at Belmarsh prison. Assange also did not participate in the last hearing on 7 April, as his lawyers reported he was unwell.

“We are alarmed by the continued disregard for Julian Assange’s health, particularly now with the added risk of his being exposed to coronavirus in detention. He should be immediately released before his health is further jeopardised, and the court must ensure that he is able to participate fully in future hearings”, said RSF UK Bureau Director Rebecca Vincent.

The defence argued for adjournment of the full extradition hearing to allow for sufficient time to adequately prepare Assange’s defence, noting that his lawyers did not currently have access to him in prison, and could not fulfill their professional obligations to him in these circumstances. They also sought to ensure his participation in proceedings, and to allow for open justice through ensuring access to the press and other observers.

The judge acknowledged that in light of the continued coronavirus lockdown, the scheduled 18 May date for the resumption of the full extradition hearing would be “uncertain at best”. She agreed to vacate that date, and scheduled an administrative hearing on 4 May to set a date to resume the full hearing. She noted that the next period the Woolwich Crown Court would be available for three consecutive weeks would be starting 2 November.

RSF observed the fifty-minute hearing via teleconference, which was also the access option provided to the media. The telephone connection did not allow for adequate monitoring of the hearing, which was difficult to hear — an issue which required the judge’s attention and interrupted proceedings.

“Today’s experience attempting to remotely observe proceedings in Julian Assange’s case was extremely frustrating, and shows that resuming the full extradition hearing in such conditions would not allow for open justice. This case is of tremendous public interest, and the press and NGO observers must be able to scrutinise proceedings. We call for the full hearing to be postponed until lockdown conditions are lifted”, said Vincent.

Assange’s legal team had previously applied for his release on bail due to health concerns, as his pre-existing medical conditions could make him more susceptible to contracting coronavirus. Judge Baraitser denied the bail application on 25 March. COVID-19 is now reportedly spreading in Belmarsh prison, where one inmate has so far been reported to have died from the virus. 

The UK is ranked 35th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2020 World Press Freedom Index, having dropped two places since 2019, in part due to Assange’s disproportionate sentencing for breaking bail, and his continued detention.

Follow thread in Reporters Without Boarders
and Marty Silk in the Sydney Morning Herald (via AAP)

Marty Silk also interviewed John Shipton

Assange’s father John Shipton hopes he will apply for bail soon to protect his health.

“So Julian can come home to his family and children rather than being in constant danger of having a lung infection in a COVID prison where two people have died of the disease,” he said outside court.

“It’s just wrong, it’s just wrong, he’s an innocent man on remand.”

Shipton added that Assange should be with his fiancee and two young sons.

“They do need their father, they do need him very soon,” he said.

Judge Baraister denied a bail application two weeks ago, when his lawyers argued Assange was in danger of contracting the coronavirus in prison

UK records highest weekly death toll from all causes since records began amid Covid-19 surge

On the 28th April 2020, RT News reports on figures produced by the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) Shocking fresh statistics show the devastating impact Covid-19 is having on the UK, revealing that it has recorded its highest weekly death toll since comparable records began in 1993. New figures released by the Office for … Continue reading “UK records highest weekly death toll from all causes since records began amid Covid-19 surge”

On the 28th April 2020, RT News reports on figures produced by the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS)

Shocking fresh statistics show the devastating impact Covid-19 is having on the UK, revealing that it has recorded its highest weekly death toll since comparable records began in 1993.

New figures released by the Office for National Statistics on Tuesday show that a total of 22,351 people died in the UK on the week ending 17 April 2020. This is the most deaths that occurred in any week since statisticians began compiling the figure 27 years ago. Staggeringly the grim statistic is 11,854 more than the five year average.

The stunning report also revealed that the death toll from Covid-19 in England and Wales was 53 percent higher than the figures announced by the government suggested.

The data indicates that the UK is on course to become one of Europe’s worst-hit countries in the coronavirus pandemic. The additional fatalities puts it ahead of France and Spain, as of April 17.

The shocking trebling of deaths in care homes in England and Wales in a matter of weeks contributed massively to the spiralling death toll. The stats office said that 7,316 people had died in care homes overall during the 16th week of 2020, almost treble the number reported in the 13th week.

Read full article RT News

Howard League for Prison Reform on COVID-19 and UK prisons

On 18th April, the Howard League for Prison Reform launched a judicial review against the UK government. Editor’s Note: material from the Howard League for Prison Reform’snarrative about what the MOJ has been saying and (not) doing is veryuseful Judicial review 17 Apr 2020: Howard League and Prison Reform Trust issue government with letter before … Continue reading “Howard League for Prison Reform on COVID-19 and UK prisons”

On 18th April, the Howard League for Prison Reform launched a judicial review against the UK government.

Editor’s Note: material from the Howard League for Prison Reform’s
narrative about what the MOJ has been saying and (not) doing is very
useful

Judicial review 17 Apr 2020: Howard League and Prison Reform Trust issue government with letter before action over its response to coronavirus in prisons, which reads

The two leading prison reform groups in the country have today (Friday 17 April) sent a formal letter before claim to the Secretary of State for Justice, Robert Buckland, over the government’s failure to respond effectively to the coronavirus pandemic in prisons.

The letter, from lawyers acting for the Howard League for Penal Reform and the Prison Reform Trust, gives details of a proposed application for judicial review in relation to the Secretary of State’s response “to the obvious need…to substantially reduce the prison population to save lives and avoid a public health catastrophe both within prisons and beyond”.

It goes on to say that, in spite of government announcements including the introduction of an end of custody temporary release scheme, “the rate of releases has been too slow and too limited to make any substantial difference to the prison population and the plans as we understand them are incapable of achieving what the Secretary of State has publicly acknowledged is required”.

Coronavirus is now known to be in more than half of prisons in England and Wales. As of 5pm on Wednesday (15 April), 232 prisoners have tested positive across 60 prisons. Ninety-six prison staff, working in 38 prisons, and seven Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) staff have also tested positive. The number of confirmed cases has more than doubled in the space of 10 days.

The letter before action suggests a range of actions that the government could take to address the problem, including expanding the scope of the temporary scheme, expediting the consideration of release of pregnant women and mothers, and considering the release of all children in custody in line with international guidance and law.

Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: “The Secretary of State has accepted publicly that the number of people in prison must be reduced significantly in order to save lives. However, this has not – and cannot – be achieved by the measures that the government currently has in place.

“The rate of infection is accelerating, and the window of opportunity to protect people is vanishing. Ministers must rise to this challenge and act immediately to avert a public health catastrophe.”Peter Dawson, Director of the Prison Reform Trust, said: “Everything good about government action in tackling this emergency has been characterised by being early and decisive. On prisons, by contrast, it is a story of too little, too late. The scientific and operational advice couldn’t be clearer – if ministers are serious about following it, they must go much further, and do it now.”

The letter before action follows weeks of urgent correspondence between the two charities and the government about the spread of coronavirus behind bars.

Last week, the charities urged ministers to move further and faster to reduce the prison population and avoid “an intolerable human cost in terms of the lives of both staff and prisoners”. As of Tuesday (14 April), however, only 18 people had been released under the two schemes announced by the government in response to the crisis. Sixteen people – 13 prisoners and three prison officers – are reported to have died.

The Prison Governors’ Association has called for the prison population to be reduced by 15,000. This is understood to be in line with advice provided to the government by public health experts.

The Howard League and Prison Reform Trust handed ministers a report by Professor Richard Coker, Emeritus Professor of Public Health at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, which sets out the most up-to-date evidence concerning the nature, spread and transmission of coronavirus as it applies to prisons.

The report cites research that estimates fatality rates from the virus of up to 12 per cent, probably associated with early rapid spread and the breakdown of, or lack of access to, healthcare services.

It states that the risk of exposure to the virus to prisoners and staff is “far, far greater” than the risks to individuals in the wider community, adding that social distancing and personal infection control measures are “almost impossible” in prisons. It recommends that authorities “should consider alternative options to incarceration where feasible”.

As the virus continues to spread in prisons, prisoners who would otherwise be safe to release risk becoming critically ill in an environment not equipped to treat them. This puts not only their lives in danger, but also those of the prison staff trying to look after them.

The consequences of further delay will be felt far beyond prison walls. Professor Coker’s report reveals that, as large shared spaces, prisons act as “epidemiological pumps”, which can drive the spread of disease among the wider community.

Explosive coronavirus outbreaks within large shared spaces have acted as preludes to wider transmission among the general population, as has been seen in a cluster of cases associated with a ski-chalet in France and in church and hospital clusters in South Korea.

England and Wales are out of step with many other countries that have taken decisive action to protect health and life.

Northern Ireland is to release 200 of its 1,500 prisoners. Scotland has also said that it will release prisoners early.
Ireland has released prisoners who had already been determined suitable for early release.
France has released almost 10,000 people from prison in the past month.
Netherlands has stopped those who were due to be detained on short sentences from doing so for the time being.
Turkey is to release tens of thousands of prisoners.
In the US, various states have released hundreds of prisoners. In California alone, 3,500 people are to be granted early release in an effort to reduce crowding.

Notes to editors

  1. The Howard League for Penal Reform is the oldest penal reform charity in the world. It is a national charity working for less crime, safer communities and fewer people in prison.
  2. The Prison Reform Trust is an independent UK charity working to create a just, humane and effective prison system.
  3. The Howard League and Prison Reform Trust are represented by Simon Creighton and Hamish Arnott of Bhatt Murphy Solicitors and Dan Squires QC of Matrix Chambers.
  4. The letter before claim states that the current government response to the pandemic is considered to be unlawful for five reasons:
    (i) It is not a rational response to a crisis that requires a substantial reduction in the prison population to avoid significant loss of life to take steps that will have little substantial impact on that population (both in terms of the overall population and the population of overcrowded prisons).
    (ii) The Secretary of State has stated publicly that he will take steps to reduce the prison population so as to lower the risks to mass infection and loss of life within the prison estate. It is a breach of legitimate expectation to have failed to take steps which have any realistic prospect of doing so.
    (iii) Prison Rule 9A(1) authorises the Secretary of State to make a direction describing specified prisoners who can be released in response to the Coronavirus. The purpose of the provision is to enable the Secretary of State to make substantial reductions to the prison population across the prison estate and in individual prisons in order to reduce the risk of significant numbers of prisoners being infected. It runs counter to and undermines that purpose to have failed to take measures which will have any substantial effect on the prison population.
    (iv) The current response is contrary to the common law duty and human rights duties to protect life and health, especially of those most vulnerable to the disease.
    (v) The failure to publish the operational details of the release schemes is contrary to the legal requirements of fairness and transparency.
  5. The letter before claim can be read in full on the Howard League website.
  6. All published correspondence between the two charities and the Secretary of State for Justice, Robert Buckland, as well as the report by Professor Richard Coker, Emeritus Professor of Public Health at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, can be read on the Howard League website.
  7. Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, and Peter Dawson, Director of the Prison Reform Trust, are available for interview. To arrange an interview, contact the charities’ respective communications teams, whose contact details are given below.

Response to COVID-19 and prisons which reads

Related discussions
Nacro: COVID-19 and keeping people in the criminal justice system safe

Our Email to all Federal Parliamentarians

On the 16th April 2020, The Australian Assange Campaign sent this email to every Member and every Senator in Federal Parliament Subject: That Julian Assange be Treated Humanely and in Accordance with International Standards  I am writing on behalf of the Australian Assange Campaign. On March 25, Mr Assange’s bail application citing COVID-19 risks was … Continue reading “Our Email to all Federal Parliamentarians”

On the 16th April 2020, The Australian Assange Campaign sent this email to every Member and every Senator in Federal Parliament

Subject: That Julian Assange be Treated Humanely and in Accordance with International Standards 

I am writing on behalf of the Australian Assange Campaign. On March 25, Mr Assange’s bail application citing COVID-19 risks was rejected. I fear that Julian Assange may not survive the COVID-19 outbreak now spreading rapidly through the UK prison systems. 

With the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic, both the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister publicly offered support for Australians overseas. I ask you to ensure that Australia urgently makes good on these promises from our foremost Parliamentary representatives. 

As a nation, we need to ensure urgent high-level, strong diplomatic representations for the release of Mr Assange from Belmarsh Prison to monitored home detention as he fits all of the grounds noted for such early release by leading organisations such as the World Health Organisation, Amnesty International, the United nations and the UK Prison Officers Association. These organisations have been unanimous in calling for the release of all non-violent detainees. For consideration: 

  • Mr Assange is a non-violent remand detainee with no history of harm to the community. He is not convicted and is thus entitled to the presumption of innocence. 
  • Doctors of Mr Assange warn he is at high risk from dying if he contracts COVID-19 as he has a pre-existing chronic lung condition. 
  • There are multiple reports that COVID-19 is rapidly spreading throughout UK prisons. There are infections and a reported COVID-19 death in Belmarsh Prison [15]. 
  • There are reports that the prison is short-staffed and normal activity regimes are suspended. 
  • Mr Assange is in poor mental health due to spending much time in solitary confinement over recent years and prison COVID-19 lockdown measures are further exacerbating his mental health. 

As a nation, we need to ensure that the UK justice systems urgently give further consideration to the very reasonable request by Mr Assange’s lawyers that this non-violent Australian detainee be released into home detention with a GPS monitored curfew and with security monitored by a private security firm answerable directly to the court.

And this is not a big ask, I am just asking you make enquiries to ensure Julian Assange is offered the same rights as other Australian citizens and is treated humanely and in accordance with international standards 

Thank you for your time, 

Matthew Bretherton 

Secretary Assange Campaign Inc 

(www.assangecampaign.org.au

************************

Background Notes And Reading: 

  • Prime Minister’s Statement

The Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison has advised 
No Australian will have to go through this (the pandemic) alone
and this has been tweeted by the Australian High Commissioner to the UK, George Brandis [1] (27thMarch) 

Assange supporters have sent over 900 emails to His Excellency Georg Brandis QC urging support for Julian Assange. 
The Australian Assange Campaign is not aware of any being answered,. 

  • Foreign Minister’s Statement

Senator the Hon Marise Payne issued a DFAT advisory (24 March) [2] 

Australians unjustly detained overseas

‘… Prison conditions in the context of the pandemic are of concern to Australia. My Department and I have made multiple, high-level, strong diplomatic representations on such cases … 

I am also concerned in particular for the health, safety and wellbeing of Australians unjustly detained overseas and those who continue to be held in detention despite a compelling humanitarian case for furlough or the remission of their sentences.

We will continue to advocate strongly for them, and others in unjust detention or with humanitarian cases for clemency, and to ensure they are treated humanely and in accordance with international standards.’

In the last few weeks, the senator has been carbon copied on over 3,500 emails from Assange supporters addressed to various key players in the UK, for example, the Chair of the NHS who has ultimate medical responsibility in a UK prison. These emails express growing distress and disbelieve at the management of the COVID-19 risks in UK prisons.

  • COVID-19 in the UK 

Over Easter the United Kingdom overtook both Iran and China to become the 6thmost infected country in the world on the John Hopkins COVID-19 dashboard [19]. They have now reported over 10,000 deaths due to the virus and reported over 90,000 infections. 
Social distancing restrictions seem to have broken the initial geometric growth cycle and it is settling at a linear growth of around 5,000 new infections reported per day. 
With over 20,000 new infections reported over Easter it is suspected that contact tracing, which has been so successful in Australia, is no longer an effective containment mechanism in the UK. 

  • References

1. ‘No Australian will have to go through this alone’ 

2.Australians unjustly detained overseas

https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-release/australians-unjustly-detained-overseas

3. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet 

Urgent action needed to prevent COVID-19 ‘rampaging through places of detention

https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25745&LangID=E

4. British prisoners ‘will die’ from coronavirus

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/coronavirus-outbreak-prisoners-will-die-andrea-albutt-a4386451.html

5. London hospitals facing ‘tsunami’ of patients (Chris Hopson) 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/london-hospitals-facing-tsunami-of-coronavirus-patients-overwhelmed

6. The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) condemns UK treatment of Julian Assange in US extradition trial

According to his lawyers, Mr Assange was handcuffed 11 times; stripped naked twice and searched; his case files confiscated after the first day of the hearing; and had his request to sit with his lawyers during the trial, rather than in a dock surrounded by bulletproof glass, denied.

https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=c05c57ee-1fee-47dc-99f9-26824208a750

7. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe released from Iran prison

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51937629

8. WHO -Prevention and control of COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention

The rights of all people affected by the COVID-19 outbreak must be upheld, and all public health measures must be carried out without discrimination of any kind. According to international human rights law, it is the responsibility of the State to ensure that people in prisons and other places of detention enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the outside community, without discrimination on the grounds of their legal status

http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-technical-guidance/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak-technical-guidance-europe/prevention-and-control-of-covid-19-in-prisons-and-other-places-of-detention

9. Doctors For Assange

Covid-19 warning in Reply to Australian Government

https://doctorsassange.org/doctors-for-assange-reply-to-australian-government-march-20

Statement on Assange Bail Hearing over Coronavirus Risk

10. Nils Melzer, UN Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk

https://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25249

Demasking the Torture of Julian Assange

https://medium.com/@njmelzer/demasking-the-torture-of-julian-assange-b252ffdcb768

11. Amnesty International – Assange bail application highlights COVID-19 risk 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/03/uk-assange-bail-application-highlights-covid19-risk-to-many-vulnerable-detainees-and-prisoners/

12. Craig Murray: Beyond Words 8thApril 

The prisons are now practising ‘cohorting’ across the estate, although decisions currently lie with individual governors. Prisoners who have a cough “any cough“ are being put together in segregated blocks. The consequences of this are of course potentially unthinkable. 

13. Express Star 27thMarch 

27 inmates test positive for Covid-19 in 14 different prisons

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2020/03/27/27-inmates-test-positive-for-covid-19-in-14-different-prisons/

14. Express Star 7thApril 

A total of nine prisoners have now died after contracting Covid-19 (one in Belmarsh) 
Some 107 prisoners had tested positive for Covid-19 in 38 jails. 
There are 19 prison staff in 12 jails who have contracted the virus as well as four prison escort and custody services staff. 

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2020/04/07/covid-19-prisoner-death-toll-rises/

15. News Shopper 7thApril 

Multiple cases of coronavirus have been confirmed inside Belmarsh Prison, and one inmate has died after contracting the virus. 

https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/18363807.first-coronavirus-death-confirmed-inside-belmarsh-prison/

16. The Guardian 7thApril 

Coronavirus will thrive in British jails: prisoners face a death sentence

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/07/coronavirus-thrive-british-jails-prisoners-face-death-sentence#maincontent

17. Daily Mail 7thApril 

Calls for 15,000 prisoners to be freed from UK jails to ease coronavirus crisis 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8195787/Covid-19-Prisoner-death-toll-rises.html

18. RT News 30thMarch 

‘ONE IN FOUR’ UK doctors forced off work as Covid-19 pandemic causes severe headache for healthcare system

https://www.rt.com/uk/484499-doctors-coronavirus-ill-nhs/

19. John Hopkins Covis-19 Dashboard 

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

Assange’s Body Bag is At-the-Ready

On 15th April 2020, Jude Fleming writes The UK Ministry of Justice Is Not Above the Law: Corporate Manslaughter includes Gross Negligence and Death in Custody. In British law “Corporate Manslaughter” includes gross negligence but what the UK Government is doing to Assange right now should be deemed a Corporate Homicide. The difference between “manslaughter” and … Continue reading “Assange’s Body Bag is At-the-Ready”

On 15th April 2020, Jude Fleming writes

The UK Ministry of Justice Is Not Above the Law: Corporate Manslaughter includes Gross Negligence and Death in Custody.

In British law “Corporate Manslaughter” includes gross negligence but what the UK Government is doing to Assange right now should be deemed a Corporate Homicide. The difference between “manslaughter” and “homicide” is intent. Right now he is trapped in Belmarsh while COVID19 rips through the prison. The UK decided to release some prisoners under new COVID19 mitigation measures to reduce numbers and risk of death in custody, but Assange does not qualify. Why is he ineligible for release under new COVID-19 temporary release measures? The answers don’t make sense. As an extradition target, he’s not currently serving a custodial sentence nor awaiting an upcoming sentencing hearing. He is a remand inmate, not a convicted criminal, and the upcoming US extradition trial will roll into a Supreme Court appeal. He needs to be convicted of a crime in the UK in order to have an upcoming sentencing hearing, therefore he is excluded from these emergency measures. Technically, Assange is innocent and that puts him into British limbo and excluded from bail release.

“The Ministry of Justice confirmed with AAP that Julian Assange, who is being held on remand in Belmarsh prison, will not be temporarily released because he’s not serving a custodial sentence and therefore not eligible. The government is also working to expedite sentencing hearings for those on remand to reduce crowding in jails, but the Australian won’t be affected by that measure either.”

Translation: Under no circumstances shall Julian Assange be released, even temporarily, to prevent his foreseeable and probable death in custody.

Julian Assange is a sitting duck. The US and the UK know this. Their combined efforts to crush him have left his life hanging in the balance. He is too close to death for them to release him on humanitarian grounds. It would undermine their intentional, slow homicide. The public would be horrified if he reemerged from the gallows. The scent of death is palpable and pungent. The homicide is nearly complete. It would take a scant withholding of his medicine, psychiatric treatment, or food and water to push him into his readied body bag.

“Her Majesty’s Homicide” is unfolding with apparent impunity. To deny Assange bail is to intentionally advance his death. It must stop now.

The UK Government is not above the law.

Read complete article in Medium

Australian Parliamentarians’ Request for Compassionate Release

On 9th April, the Co-Chairs of the Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group wrote to the Chair of the UK Justice Committee and the Lord Chancellor and Secretary for State for Justice.

On 9th April, the Co-Chairs of the Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group wrote to the Chair of the UK Justice Committee and the Lord Chancellor and Secretary for State for Justice.

Doctors For Assange: Statement on Assange Bail Hearing over Coronavirus Risk

March 27, 2020 Doctors4Assange strongly condemns Wednesday’s decision by UK District Judge Vanessa Baraitser to deny bail to Julian Assange. Despite our prior unequivocal statement[1]that Mr Assange is at increased risk of serious illness and death were he to contract coronavirus, and the evidence of medical experts, Baraitser dismissed the risk, citing UK guidelines for … Continue reading “Doctors For Assange: Statement on Assange Bail Hearing over Coronavirus Risk”

March 27, 2020

Doctors4Assange strongly condemns Wednesday’s decision by UK District Judge Vanessa Baraitser to deny bail to Julian Assange. Despite our prior unequivocal statement[1]that Mr Assange is at increased risk of serious illness and death were he to contract coronavirus, and the evidence of medical experts, Baraitser dismissed the risk, citing UK guidelines for prisons in responding to the global pandemic: “I have no reason not to trust this advice as both evidence-based and reliable and appropriate.”[2]  

Notably, however, Baraitser did not address the increased risk to Mr Assange relative to the general UK prison population, let alone prisoners at HMP Belmarsh where Assange is incarcerated. Nor did she address the rapidly emerging medical and legal consensus that vulnerable and low-risk prisoners should be released, immediately.

As the court heard, Mr Assange is at increased risk of contracting and dying from the novel disease coronavirus (COVID-19), a development which has led the World Health Organization to declare a public health emergency of international concern[3] and a global pandemic.[4] The reasons for Mr Assange’s increased risk include his ongoing psychological torture, his history of medical neglect and fragile health, and chronic lung disease.

Edward Fitzgerald, QC, representing Mr Assange, said, “These [medical] experts consider that he is particularly at risk of developing coronavirus and, if he does, that it develops into very severe complications for him… If he does develop critical symptoms it would be very doubtful that Belmarsh would be able to cope with his condition.”[5]

Baraitser’s casual dismissal of Mr Assange’s dire situation in the face of the COVID-19 emergency stood in stark contrast not only to the expert medical evidence, but the proceedings themselves. The hearing took place on the third day of the UK’s coronavirus lock-down. Of the two counsels representing Mr Assange, Edward Fitzgerald QC wore a facemask and Mark Summers QC participated via audiolink. US attorneys joined the proceedings by phone. 

Mr Assange himself appeared by videolink, which was terminated after around an hour, rendering him unable to follow the remainder of his own hearing, including the defence summation and the District Judge’s ruling. Mr Assange’s supporters attending in person observed social distancing measures. Overall only 15 people were in attendance, including judge, counsel, and observers.

Baraitser further erred by stating that because no prisoners at HMP Belmarsh currently have coronavirus, Assange was not yet at risk. Mr Assange’s counsel noted, in contrast, that they had difficulty visiting him after being told by Belmarsh staff that over 100 Belmarsh employees are currently “self-isolating”. Furthermore, it is unclear whether any Belmarsh prisoners have even been tested for coronavirus.

Baraitser’s assurance that government measures were adequate to protect Mr Assange also rang hollow on the very day the UK government announced that Prince Charles tested positive for COVID-19. If the UK government cannot protect its own royal family from the disease, how can it adequately protect its most vulnerable prisoners in prisons, which have been described as “breeding grounds” for coronavirus?  

Furthermore, news emerged on the day of the hearing that 19 prisoners in 10 prisons across the UK had tested positive for coronavirus, an increase of 6 prisoners in 24 hours.[6] From the time of the hearing to date, two UK inmates have died from COVID-19, both of whom, like Assange, are men in high risk groups.[7]

This news, and the decision to deny Mr Assange bail, is alarming in light of numerous statements and reports that have called out the risk to prisoners, urgently recommending release of non-violent prisoners, as well as actions taken by other nations to alleviate the risk.

Specifically, a March 17 report[8] by Professor of Public Health, Richard Coker of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, found that “congregate settings” such as prisons provide ideal conditions for “explosive transmission” of coronavirus. “Hours matter” in terms of containment, Professor Coker warns. The report recommends that “if detention is unnecessary it should be relaxed. This should be done before the virus has a chance to enter a detention centre.”  

Accordingly, on the same day as Mr. Assange’s bail hearing, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, issued a statement[9] calling on authorities to release prisoners who are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19, as well as low-risk inmates. “Now, more than ever, governments should release every person detained without sufficient legal basis, including political prisoners and others detained simply for expressing critical or dissenting views”, she said. 

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has warned that in a health crisis such as that posed by COVID-19, the rights of detained people must be protected under the UN ‘Mandela Rules’ governing the rights of prisoners, noting that prisons are home to vulnerable populations such as the elderly, inmates with illnesses or disabilities, and pregnant or juvenile detainees. Such populations are often detained in facilities that are “overcrowded” and “unhygienic”, in some cases “dangerously so” she stressed. 

“Physical distancing and self-isolation in such conditions are practically impossible”, the High Commissioner wrote. “With outbreaks of the disease, and an increasing number of deaths, already reported in prisons and other institutions in an expanding number of countries, authorities should act now to prevent further loss of life among detainees and staff.”

Consistent with that advice, in Mr Assange’s home country of Australia, on March 24 the New South Wales government announced[10] the early release of select prisoners, based on their “health vulnerability” and custodial and conviction status, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the US, the chief physician of Rikers Island, New York, has urged judges and prosecutors to release inmates, where possible, to protect them from coronavirus, and 600 prisoners incarcerated for minor and non-violent offences have been released in Los Angeles. Over 3,000 doctors and medical workers have also signed an open letter urging US immigration authorities to release detainees in order to mitigate the COVID-19 outbreak.[11]

Adding their legal voices to these medical and human rights authorities, the day after Mr Assange’s bail hearing, three professors in law and criminology recommended “granting bail to unsentenced prisoners to stop the spread of coronavirus”.[12]

Julian Assange is just such an unsentenced prisoner with significant health vulnerability. He is being held on remand, with no custodial sentence or UK charge in place, let alone conviction. 

Doctors4Assange are additionally concerned that keeping Assange in Belmarsh not only increases his risk of contracting coronavirus, it will increase his isolation and his inability to prepare his defence for his upcoming extradition hearing, in violation of his human right to prepare a defence. Mr Assange’s lawyers have been increasingly restricted from visiting him as prisons lockdown visitation to prevent spread of the coronavirus.

These two factors are already major contributors to Mr Assange’s psychological torture, and we are alarmed that the combination of Baraitser’s decision, together with increasingly stringent prison restrictions in response to the pandemic, will intensify that very torture. This further increases his vulnerability to coronavirus.

Moreover, Assange’s witnesses are unlikely to be able to travel to his extradition hearing in May, due to travel restrictions put in place by either the UK or their home countries. This could result in further delay to his extradition hearing, thereby prolonging his medically dangerous abuse by psychological torture and politically motivated medical neglect, as we detailed in our letter published in the March 7 issue of The Lancet.[13]

Kristinn Hrafnsson, editor in chief of WikiLeaks, summarised Baraitser’s decision in a manner consistent with the overwhelming medical and legal consensus, and long held-medical ethics: “To expose another human being to serious illness, and to the threat of losing their life, is grotesque and quite unnecessary. This is not justice, it is a barbaric decision.”[14]

Contact: info@doctorsassange.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/doctors4assange


[1] From the Doctros4Assange website: https://doctorsassange.org/embargoed-press-release-doctors-for-assange-reply-to-minister-payne-18-03-20/

[2] From Marty Silk live tweet during the proceedings: https://twitter.com/MartySilkHack/status/1242807708778192897

[3] From the World Health Organization website: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)

[4] From the World Health Organization website: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic

[5] Bridges for Media Freedom, Briefing, Assange Bail Application, 25 March 2020.

[6] https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2020/03/25/prisons-19-inmates-test-positive-for-coronavirus-in-10-jails/

[7] https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/26/second-uk-prisoner-dies-contracting-coronavirus-inside-12459973/

[8] https://detentionaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Report-on-Detention-and-COVID-Final-1.pdf

[9] https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25745&LangID=E

[10] https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw-prepares-for-early-release-of-prisoners-during-covid-19-pandemic-20200324-p54db5.html

[11] https://countercurrents.org/2020/03/coronavirus-pandemic-u-s-doctors-demand-immediate-release-of-prisoners-and-detainees

[12] http://theconversation.com/we-need-to-consider-granting-bail-to-unsentenced-prisoners-to-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-134526

[13] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30383-4/fulltext

[14] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/julian-assange-coronavirus-prison-bail-release-belmarsh-latest-a9424621.html

Refer Doctors For Assange Web Site with followup posts