There Is No Evidence Russia Hacked the DNC and Gave Emails to WikiLeaks

On the 16th May 2020, Joe Hoft  writes Jesse Watters at Watters’ World confirmed tonight what we have been reporting for years and we were absolutely correct. Deep State participant Crowdstrike had no information that Russia hacked the DNC and then forwarded hacked emails to WikiLeaks. This was a lie! The release of documents from … Continue reading “There Is No Evidence Russia Hacked the DNC and Gave Emails to WikiLeaks”

On the 16th May 2020, Joe Hoft  writes

Jesse Watters at Watters’ World confirmed tonight what we have been reporting for years and we were absolutely correct. Deep State participant Crowdstrike had no information that Russia hacked the DNC and then forwarded hacked emails to WikiLeaks. This was a lie!

The release of documents from the Intel Community that were held up by corrupt liar, Rep. Adam Schiff, show incredible information that destroys the Deep State’s many lies. The biggest lie which the Russia collusion sham was based on was the tale that Russia hacked the DNC and then gave the hacked emails to WikiLeaks, who in turn released them before the 2016 election.

The whole story was a lie!

Aaron Mate from The Gray Zone joined Jesse Watters to discuss the Russian “hacking” scandal and Crowdstrike.

Aaron Mate analysis from twitter

On March 8, 2020 and before on June 16, 2019, we presented arguments against the Mueller gang’s assertion that the DNC was hacked by Russians. 

Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.

Read whole article at The Gateway Pundit

Absurd claims of Julian Assange being Russian tool only made to justify Hillary’s loss to Trump

On 5th March 2020 RT News interviewed John Shipton Julian Assange published the DNC leaks in 2016 not because of links to Russia, but because he was always longing for truth, John Shipton said as he recalled key moments of his son’s life in an interview with RT Documentary. Claims by the US intelligence services … Continue reading “Absurd claims of Julian Assange being Russian tool only made to justify Hillary’s loss to Trump”

On 5th March 2020 RT News interviewed John Shipton

Julian Assange published the DNC leaks in 2016 not because of links to Russia, but because he was always longing for truth, John Shipton said as he recalled key moments of his son’s life in an interview with RT Documentary.

Claims by the US intelligence services that Assange received the leaked 2016 Democratic National Committee emails directly from the Kremlin are “absurd,” Shipton said.

WikiLeaks published the files, which revealed the DNC’s bias against candidate Bernie Sanders and eventually cost Hillary Clinton dearly in the presidential race against Donald Trump. At the time, Assange was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

While in the embassy, Julian was “the most surveyed person on the planet,” with anybody entering the facility photographed and recorded by both the British and Ecuadorian secret services. Under such circumstances, it’s just “impossible” to imagine that he could’ve had any contacts with the Russian intelligence, Shipton pointed out.

Shipton said that accusations of his son’s links to Russia were the same as “the Skripal poisoning – another ridiculous MI6 scandal”. Former double agent Sergey Skripal and his daughter were allegedly poisoned with a nerve agent in Salisbury, UK in 2018, with Britain swiftly blaming Russia for the incident, but never bothering to provide any convincing proof for it.

Read complete article in RT News

John Shipton: “My Heart is on Fire”

On the 24th February 2020, from Vienna, Von Stefan Schocher reports ( google translation from German) John Shipton on his struggle for support for his son Julian Assange and his visit to Vienna. profil: What do you expect from your meeting at the State Department? Shipton: I will stand up for my son and make … Continue reading “John Shipton: “My Heart is on Fire””

On the 24th February 2020, from Vienna, Von Stefan Schocher reports ( google translation from German)

John Shipton on his struggle for support for his son Julian Assange and his visit to Vienna.

profil: What do you expect from your meeting at the State Department?

Shipton: I will stand up for my son and make it clear that there is a historic change in Europe, for Julian, for free expression and exchange of information in the EU. There were 25 camera teams in Paris yesterday. Before that in London: 23 camera crews. There is increasing support.

profile: Do you get such positive feedback from political or even government circles?
Shipton: The support is huge in Germany. After all, Sigmar Gabriel [the SPD Parliamentarian stands up for Assange] was the Foreign Minister. That there is no voice of contradiction on the part of the government means tacit approval.

profil: You also explore the chances that your son will get asylum in a European country. Where do you have the highest hopes?

Shipton: Let’s start in the middle: Switzerland will offer Julian a humanitarian visa. This is the first official recognition and very important. In the absolute heart of Europe, he could recover from the consequences of his torture and accept visiting professorships across Europe. But I think there will be a competition for who can offer the most protection. That’s how it should be. After ten years of working at the interface between governments and information, he still has a lot to give.

profil: What is the goal of your mission?

Shipton: I am now in Vienna to advertise in the State Department that Austria will become part of the global movement that wants Julian to be released – as an icon of oppression by journalists, media or publicists. The oppression of journalists is a global problem. And if it is not solved, it will determine the taste and smell of the coming century.

profile: What is Julian Assange’s health and mental state?

Shipton: I can only comment on my own mental state. His state of health is a problem after nine years of increasing psychological torture, as Nils Melzer [UN Special Rapporteur on Torture] highlighted in his report. Julian is an intellectual, a sensitive person, but just one with a very strong will. And he’s in a high security prison along side terrorists and murderers.

profile: Edward Fitzgerald, your son’s lawyer, says the U.S. government has offered a pardon if Julian Assange rejects Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. election campaign. If there was this offer, why didn’t he accept it?

Shipton: I don’t know. I don’t know the facts. I think the hearing next week will bring clarification in many ways.

profil: WikiLeaks published emails surrounding Trump’s competitor Hillary Clinton in the middle of the 2016 election campaign. It had the smell of a Kremlin action. How does your son see it

Shipton: I reject your question. None of Julian’s actions were in the spirit of Vladimir Putin. Everything that is published on WikiLeaks comes from the population. Julian is pro truth. He verifies everything that is published very carefully and does everything to protect the sources.

profile: Should your son find asylum – will he continue?

Shipton: WikiLeaks is a robust global news organization with a reputation for being accurate and reputable.

profile: The case against WikiLeaks is not just a criminal case, but has immense political implications. Do you think the geopolitical conditions for political support from Europe are favorable? The transatlantic relationship has broken. Asylum for Julian Assange will not improve it.

Shipton: It was a political case from the start. I like Europe very much. Vienna is wonderful, Paris is great, Geneva is fantastic – I would love to live there, but I cannot afford it. I want Europe to be steadfast in its relations with Washington instead of steadfastly on Washington’s call. Strength and independence mean that you can make good decisions and take responsibility for them. I wish that for Europe. My heart is burning when I see that the EU is not representing the interests of its citizens.

John Shipton

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s father is currently traveling through the EU to campaign for his son to be granted asylum in a European country. On Friday he was in Vienna for a talk at the Foreign Ministry. profil met the Australian for an interview immediately before – a quiet man who ponders his words and chooses wisely. Only at the end of the conversation Shipton warns to hurry. Before the appointment at Minoritenplatz, he has to quickly get a tie.

Full article in German in profil

America’s long history of meddling in other countries’ elections

Martin Williams Writes 23 November 2017 Editors Note: Getting old but very entirely relevant relevant current conversations ‘One in nine elections’ Dov Levin, an academic from the Institute for Politics and Strategy at Carnegie Mellon University, has calculated the vast scale of election interventions by both the US and Russia. According to his research, there were … Continue reading “America’s long history of meddling in other countries’ elections”

Martin Williams Writes 23 November 2017
Editors Note: Getting old but very entirely relevant relevant current conversations

‘One in nine elections’

Dov Levin, an academic from the Institute for Politics and Strategy at Carnegie Mellon University, has calculated the vast scale of election interventions by both the US and Russia.

According to his research, there were 117 “partisan electoral interventions” between 1946 and 2000. That’s around one of every nine competitive elections held since Second World War.

The majority of these – almost 70 per cent – were cases of US interference.

And these are not all from the Cold War era; 21 such interventions took place between 1990 and 2000, of which 18 were by the US.

“60 different independent countries have been the targets of such interventions,” Levin’s writes. “The targets came from a large variety of sizes and populations, ranging from small states such as Iceland and Grenada to major powers such as West Germany, India, and Brazil.”

Read Complete Article in Chanel 4 News

Five Things That Would Make The CIA/CNN Russia Narrative More Believable

Caitlin Johnstone writes 2018/7/14 on the burden of proof, election meddling, collusion, Russia, Wikileaks and the truth Proof of a hacking conspiracy to elect Trump.  Proof that election meddling actually influenced the election in a meaningful way. Some reason to believe Russian election meddling was unwarranted and unacceptable. Proof that the election meddling went beyond … Continue reading “Five Things That Would Make The CIA/CNN Russia Narrative More Believable”

Caitlin Johnstone writes 2018/7/14 on the burden of proof, election meddling, collusion, Russia, Wikileaks and the truth

  1. Proof of a hacking conspiracy to elect Trump.
  2.  Proof that election meddling actually influenced the election in a meaningful way.
  3. Some reason to believe Russian election meddling was unwarranted and unacceptable.
  4. Proof that the election meddling went beyond simply giving Americans access to information about their government.
  5. A valid reason to believe escalated tensions between two nuclear superpowers are worthwhile

The Editor wishes to highlight strength of reason in the fourth ‘thing’

If anything, Americans should be upset that they had to hear about Democratic Party corruption through the grapevine instead of having light shed on it by the American officials whose job it is to do so. Complaints about election meddling is only valid if that election meddling isn’t comprised of truth and facts.

Read full article in Medium

Who Leaked the DNC Emails?

On the 3rd January 2019 Yaacov Apelbaum posted an in depth analysis of access to the DNC mail server So who Pwned the DNC’s and Podesta’s emails? The Russians? Romanians? Or was it just your run of the mill developer/sysAdmin/staffer with an axe to grind? To find out more, check out the post by William Binney and … Continue reading “Who Leaked the DNC Emails?”

On the 3rd January 2019 Yaacov Apelbaum posted an in depth analysis of access to the DNC mail server

So who Pwned the DNC’s and Podesta’s emails? The Russians? Romanians? Or was it just your run of the mill developer/sysAdmin/staffer with an axe to grind? To find out more, check out the post by William Binney and Larry Johnson. Here is a little illustration that helps focus some of their data transfer rate arguments and expand on other cyber security points:

If you are still confused about the who, what, when, where, and how, you are not alone. The reason for this heavy fog is that it’s impossible to separate the spin from facts without access to the forensic data–which for some reason doesn’t’ seem to make itself available. As far as the pro and con arguments for a local vs. remote access are concerned, yes, theoretically an external attacker could have used a cocktail of zero day + remote privilege elevation + password recovery against the cloud based NGP VAN voter system, but so could a local user/administrator at a fraction of the time and effort. 

What about the identity of the perp? According to the WaPo (using Crowdstrike, the DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government leaker in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs.

End conclusion

In lieu of answering these pesky questions, we are left with the only remaining explanation that uses the following formula for predicting cyber attack origins:
“Path of Least Resistance”+
“Principle of Least Effort” +
“Opportunity” +
“Motive”
= “Insider”,
AKA one of them green guys on the right side of Image 1.

Read whole analysis and and commentary in Yaacov Apelbaum’s Blog