Ai Weiwei Accuses Curators of Rejecting Artwork Over Julian Assange Content

On the 2nd June artist Ai Weiwei posted on Ope Ed in Art Net that has been circulating on various major news services

The Chinese dissident artist Ai Weiwei says he’s hypocritically been removed from a British exhibition because he chose to design a piece that addressed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s incarceration in a London prison.

One person’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter’ is a flowery way of saying actions can be interpreted differently, depending on your viewpoint.

It’s a scenario acclaimed Chinese artist Ai Weiwei has often encountered and, unfortunately, is in again.

He fled his homeland for being deemed too controversial for the state’s strict censorship. He’s recounted how he was arrested, beaten by Chinese police, placed under house arrest and then imprisoned for tax evasion.

On his release, he described being subjected to psychological torture, being detained in a tiny room with constant light and two guards never more than 30 inches away, even when he used the bathroom.

In 2019, he fled to Berlin, but didn’t stay long, “I don’t like a state or culture that so obeys authority”, he declared, adding: “They would say in Germany you have to speak German. They deeply don’t like foreigners.” READ MOREPhoto of Chinese artist Ai Weiwei posing as drowned refugee child Aylan Kurdi sparks controversy

He now resides in the picturesque city of Cambridge in the east of England. So it was understandable when last year The Great Big Art Exhibition asked a world famous artist, who called the UK home, to take part.

However, Weiwei is no longer part of the project despite his reputation being used to draw attention to it. 


Because he wanted to feature in the exhibition a postcard with the image of Julian Assange’s treadmill. The WikiLeaks founder used it for exercise during his almost seven-year spell in London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where he’d sought refuge. 

The exhibition hopes to encourage Britons to make art and display it in their windows, a tonic to beat the gloom of the pandemic. Weiwei opted for his contribution to be a Postcard for Political Prisoners, which members of the public could send to political prisoners around the world, their addresses supplied by Amnesty.

Although people could send it to themselves to display in their own window if they wished.

Weiwei wanted to inspire them to engage in art-activism, a practise that has made him globally admired.

However, his idea was rejected.

However, his idea was rejected.

Weiwei claims that Sally Shaw, the director of Firstsite, who are leading the project, “seemed too afraid to give us a straight answer” and added: “I think the reason is related to Assange who has been incarcerated in HM Prison Belmarsh in London since his arrest on April 11, 2019, and that they don’t want to touch on a topic like Assange.

Shaw has denied Weiwei’s claims: “The sending of a postcard takes us away from this intention. I must assure you, sincerely, that this is in no way a reflection of our appreciation of the idea itself, which is remarkable and profound, and equally our esteem for Weiwei and his work.”

Weiwei has managed to break a glass ceiling, his art is widely admired for the aesthetic and then also its deeper meanings – very few artists share that ability. To have someone like him involved would undoubtedly have elevated the credibility and sophistication of the project.

Weiwei said of the rejection: “I feel ashamed that nowadays all art does is whitewash. My artwork has once again proven how the art world is corrupt.”

Chris Shaw writes

As a country, we should be welcoming individuals like Weiwei but strictly adhering to consistency. It’s arrogant to shut down his work when it embarrasses our own transgressions, and that’s what the treatment of Assange is.

Sally Shaw was awarded an MBE in the The Queen’s Birthday Honours List only months ago for services to the Arts and yet decides to cancel Weiwei.

We’re a closed shop, but don’t like to admit it. And world-class hypocrites. Why else would we censor a globally recognised artist?

The message is clear; criticise those who it suits us and we’ll support you, but come looking for us and we’ll erase your platform.

Hypocrites? Nah, spineless cowards.

Arts Net
The Guardian
RT News